To compare Pericapsular nerve group block and Suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for pain reduction during positioning patients with hip fractures for spinal anaesthesia

Comparison of Pericapsular nerve group block and Suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for reduction of pain during positioning patients with hip fractures for Spinal anaesthesia : A Prospective Randomised Blinded Study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/09/074427

Enrollment

Registered

2024-09-26

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca compartment block: 0.25% Ropivacaine 30 mL to be administered via USG guidance to suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment in 5 mL increments after negative a

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 18-65 years 2. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I and II 3. Patients posted for elective surgery for hip fracture under spinal anaesthesia 4. Availability of informed and written consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. BMI more than 35kg per metre square 2. Known hypersensitivity to any of the drugs used in the study. 3. Patients not able to communicate properly or having hearing impairment 4. Patients with coagulopathy or on anticoagulation therapy. 5. Patient having infection at the site of block. 6. Pre-existing neurologic or anatomic deficits in the lower extremities 7. Patients on analgesic for chronic pain 8. Patients with untreated psychiatric illness, or using psychoactive substances 9. Prior surgery in the corresponding side of the inguinal or suprainguinal area

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of analgesia measured with NRS during positioning for spinal anesthesia between patients receiving S-FICB and PENG block.Timepoint: After administering the block, analgesia at rest will be assessed at every 5 minutes interval and recorded on numeric pain rating scale, till 25 minutes.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Comparison of the ease of positioning for spinal anaesthesia measured with EOSP score between patients receiving S-FICB & PENG block. 2. Comparison of hemodynamic changes between the two groups 3. To evaluate Intra procedural complications with both the blocksTimepoint: EOSP score will be assessed 30 minutes after the block. Intra operative hemodynamic changes will be monitored at every 15 minutes interval till 60 minutes followed by every 30 minutes interval till the end of surgery. Intraprocedural complications if any to be specified	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Comparison of the ease of positioning for spinal anaesthesia measured with EOSP score between patients receiving S-FICB & PENG block. 2. Comparison of hemodynamic changes between the two groups 3. To evaluate Intra procedural complications with both the blocksTimepoint: EOSP score will be assessed 30 minutes after the block. Intra operative hemodynamic changes will be monitored at every 15 minutes interval till 60 minutes followed by every 30 minutes interval till the end of surgery. Intraprocedural complications if any to be specified

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Priyam Saikia

Gauhati Medical College and Hospital

saikia.priyam80@gmail.com9706067392

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026