FindTrial
Sign In

evaluation of the accuracy of implant crown fabricated by two different methods

Comparative evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single posterior implant retained crown fabricated using conventional and digital impression workflow- an in vivo study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/09/074333
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-09-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K081- Complete loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: digital workflow: accuracy of implant crown Control Intervention1: conventional workflow: accuracy of implant crown

Sponsors

prerna kalyani
Lead Sponsor
prerna kalyani
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Patient age between 21-60 years. 2 Patient in need of an implant supported crown in the molar region who have successfully completed stage 1 of implant treatment. 3 Absence of any medical condition. 4 Absence of any periodontal disease. 5 Opposing dentition should be natural teeth or fixed definitive restoration on teeth or implant. 6 Presence of at least one intact adjacent tooth or fixed definitive restoration on teeth or implant. 7 Patients who are willing to participate in the present study and willing sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Participants with inadequate oral hygiene. 2 Implants showing signs of peri-implantitis. 3 Presence of periapical radiolucency at adjacent teeth. 4 Periodontitis or persistent intraoral infections. 5 Absence of adjacent teeth. 6 Untreated mucosal diseases. 7 Presence of parafunctional habits

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
•To evaluate marginal and internal fit of single posterior implant retained crown fabricated using conventional and digital impression workflowTimepoint: •baseline—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• To compare marginal & internal fit of single posterior implant retained crown fabricated using conventional & digital impression workflow.Timepoint: baseline—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPrerna Suresh Kalyani

KLE VK INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCE

patilprostho@gmail.com8792650805

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026