Skip to content

To look for various options to adapt gums around the implants for natural looking crowns .

Investigating the Impact of tailored healing abutment and abutment variations on peri-implant soft tissue contour in immediate implant placement with delayed loading: An In vivo study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/09/074283
Enrollment
24
Registered
2024-09-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: customized healing abutments: checking the effect of customized healing abutments and various abutments on the peri implant soft tissue Control Intervention1: stock gingival former: c

Sponsors

Priyanka Arora
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Good oral hygiene. Patient in the age group of 18-55 years. ? Patients requiring single tooth replacement with immediate implant placement. ? Mesio-distal width of 8 mm or less. ? Presence of adjacent teeth and antagonist teeth in alignment with absence of tilting / supra-eruption

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: According to ASA Classification Class 4 patients: ? Heart disease with marked signs of cardiac insufficiency. ? Recent myocardial infarction of less than 6 months duration. ? Unstable angina. ? Patients with advanced degrees of pulmonary, renal or endocrine insufficiency. ? Severe cardiac valvular dysfunction ? Sepsis ? Disseminated intravascular coagulation According to ASA Classification class 3 patients: ? Uncontrolled diabetes with complications to vascular or other organs i.e. retinopathy, neuropathy etc. Active hepatitis ? Implanted pacemaker ? Immunocompromised patients   ? Blood dyscrasias   ? Occlusal anomalies ? Deep Bite ? Cross Bite Para-functional habits Bruxism   ? ? Radiation therapy in orofacial region   ? Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day)   ? ? Alcohol abusers   ? Recent history of any acute illness   ? ? Patients having unrealistic expectations and psychological problems. ? ? Local factors: ? Teeth associated with large periapical lesions (granuloma & cyst) ? ? Periodontally compromised teeth with one or more bony wall defects ? ? Presence of dehiscence or fenestrations of residual bony walls ? ? Insufficient inter-arch space ? ? Intraoral draining sinus in relation to the proposed implant site ? Perforation and/or loss of labial bony plate during extraction ? Unfavourable implant axis orientation ? ? Patients with TMJ disorders ? ? Thin gingival tissue biotypes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We will come to know which type of healing abutment gives best emergence profile .Timepoint: First scan will be done at Baseline -at o month during implant placement. Second scan will be done at 3 months (during loading) & Third Scan will be done 3 months post loading.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We will look for bleeding index & plaque index.Timepoint: First time point is at o month during implant placement second time point is at 3 months during loading & third time point is 3months post loading

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPriyanka Arora

SGT University

reshu.sanan@sgtuniversity.org9910063626

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026