Comparing Intubation Technique with flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope : Midline vs. Right Molar Approach

Randomised comparative evaluation of midline approach and right molar approach for time for successful oral endotracheal intubation with flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/09/074234

Enrollment

124

Registered

2024-09-24

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: fiberoptic bronchoscope: oral flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope inserting orally till intubation complete and confirmed at baseline Control Intervention1: Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscop

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA grade – I and II Age group 18-60 years. Healthy and intact teeth MMPG grade I and II Normal neck movement Normal upper lip bite test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Absent or loose teeth Artificial denture BMI more than 30 Kg/m2 Cervical spine disease Temporomandibular joint abnormalities

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Total duration of time taken for intubationTimepoint: T3 at baseline	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Time taken to achieve first laryngeal view T1 2. Time taken from first laryngeal view (T1) till capnographic confirmation of orotracheal fiberoptic placement (T2) 3. Number of attempts 4. First glottis view - POGO SCORE 5. Ease of the intubation – excellent easy to perform Feasible 6. Hemodynamic parameters (HR, MBP, SpO2) 7. Any adverse event like bradycardia, tachycardia, hypertension, apnoea or injury during intubationTimepoint: T1 Time taken to achieve first laryngeal view T2 Time taken from first laryngeal view (T1) till capnographic confirmation of orotracheal fiberoptic placement	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Time taken to achieve first laryngeal view T1 2. Time taken from first laryngeal view (T1) till capnographic confirmation of orotracheal fiberoptic placement (T2) 3. Number of attempts 4. First glottis view - POGO SCORE 5. Ease of the intubation – excellent easy to perform Feasible 6. Hemodynamic parameters (HR, MBP, SpO2) 7. Any adverse event like bradycardia, tachycardia, hypertension, apnoea or injury during intubationTimepoint: T1 Time taken to achieve first laryngeal view T2 Time taken from first laryngeal view (T1) till capnographic confirmation of orotracheal fiberoptic placement

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Sanjeev Sharma

ABVIMS and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital , New Delhi

drss21@yahoo.com9873768774

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026