A Comparative Study Of Quality Of Life Following Elective Mesh Repair Of inguinal Hernia By Laparascopic Vs Open Approach

A Comparative Study Of Quality Of Life Following Elective Mesh Repair Of inguinal Hernia By Laparascopic(Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair) Vs Open(Liechtenstein) Approach - A Randomized Control Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/09/074186

Enrollment

Registered

2024-09-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K409- Unilateral inguinal hernia, without obstruction or gangrene

Interventions

Intervention1: Laparoscopic transabdominal pre peritoneal repair: The TAPP (Transabdominal Preperitoneal) procedure involves laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias by placing mesh in the preperitonea

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All adults diagnosed with primary uncomplicated inguinal Hernia and planned for Elective Mesh Repair.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients who belong to ASA grade 4 and above. 2. Patients with previous history of abdominal and pelvic surgery. 3.Patients with BMI more than 35

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare quality of life following Elective Mesh Repair Of inguinal Hernia By Laparascopic ( Transabdominal Preperitoneal repair) vs open (Liechtenstein) approach using Carolina comfort scale on post operative day 7 and 30Timepoint: Quality of life assessment using Carolina comfort scale at POD 7,30 (one week and 4 week )	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NilTimepoint: Nil	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPawan Kumar Rattu

Lady Hardigne Medical College

pawansurgeon@gmail.com8826475476

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026