Skip to content

To compare graft take and graft quality between split-thickness skin graft alone and split-thickness skin graft over acellular dermal matrix in a surgically created wound

A prospective study to compare immediate application of split-thickness skin graft over acellular dermal matrix with split-thickness skin graft alone in surgically created wounds - NIL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/09/074061
Enrollment
52
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: T07- Unspecified multiple injuries

Interventions

Intervention1: Split-thickness skin graft over acellular dermal matrix vs split-thickness skin graft alone: I will be comparing outcomes following single stage grafting of acellular dermal matrix of

Sponsors

ESIC Medical College and Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of age more than 10 years and of either sex. Wound size (20cm square – 150cm square)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus Peripheral Vascular disease Burn wounds

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the percentage of graft takeTimepoint: At postoperative Day 5 and Day 10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the quality of skin graft in terms of pigmentation and pliability.Timepoint: At 8 weeks postoperatively

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAnanay Vishvakarma

ESIC Medical College and Hospital

bhupimch@gmail.com7065867584

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026