FindTrial
Sign In

Check the outcome by comparing the use of two instruments in difficult accessible mandibular fractures.

Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications in the surgical management of mandibular body and angle fractures using right angled drills versus straight drills- A surgeons perspective - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/09/073723
Enrollment
42
Registered
2024-09-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S026- Fracture of mandible

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Smaranjit Saha
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with mandibular fractures- body, angle, ramus, condyles 2. Patients aged between 12 to 80 with ASA grading 1 to 3 3. Patients who will be managed surgically 4. Patients who are willing for the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with infected fractures 2. Patients with tissue loss on the affected site 3. Patients who are not willing for the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary- Surgeons perspective 1) Ease of handling 2) Manoeuvrability in tight spaces 3) Visibility of site 4) Tactile feedback 5) Retraction injury 6) Overall satisfaction with drill performance and hardware fixation Timepoint: day 1,7,14—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary-Patients perspective 1) Pain 2) edemaTimepoint: day 1,7,14—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR SREEA ROY

MANIPAL COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCIENCE

drandymanipal@gmail.com9742354052

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026