Clinical comparison of quality of root canal filling material and post-procedural pain in primary teeth using 2 different rotary files

Clinical comparison of quality of obturation and postoperative pain in primary molars using Kedo-SG and Kedo-plus Square files (A Pilot study) - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/09/073627

Enrollment

Registered

2024-09-09

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Kedo-S Plus files: NIL Intervention2: Kedo-S Plus files: 3 hrs., 6 hrs., 12 hrs., 24 hrs., 48 hrs. Control Intervention1: Kedo-SG files: NIL Control Intervention2: Kedo SG files: 3 hrs.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Amount of tooth structure su?cient for placing a rubber dam clamp Presence of at least two-third of the root length Primary molar teeth with chronic irreversible pulpitis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with systemic disease Excessive mobility More than one-third of root resorption

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the quality of root canal filling in primary molars using Kedo-SG and Kedo-S plus filesTimepoint: After 1 hr.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of post-operative pain in primary molars using Kedo-SG and Kedo-S Plus filesTimepoint: Post-operative pain is measured at 5 different timepoints - 3 hrs., 6 hrs., 12 hrs., 24 hrs., 48 hrs.	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Balagopal Varma

Amrita School of Denistry

balagopalvarma@aims.amrita.edu9447032358

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026