Skip to content

Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy: Which Works Better for First-Year Residents?

A comparison of video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for successful intubation by first year residents. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/09/073466
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-09-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Control Intervention1: 1. Time taken to intubate 2. Cormack - Lehane grading of glottic view 3. Success of intubation 4. Attempts taken 5. Use of external laryngeal maneuvers 6. Presence of postoperat

Sponsors

Dr Aishwarya Balasubramanian
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Residents who are in their first three months of their anaesthesiology residency.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Residents who have finished their first year of residency.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time required to intubate Timepoint: Measured in seconds from insertion of the intubating instrument into the mouth until 1 capnographic wave is observed

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Glottic view seenTimepoint: At the end of intubation;Number of attempts taken to intubateTimepoint: At the end of intubation - with each subsequent attempt defined as a re-insertion of the laryngoscope blade;Presence of endotracheal tube in airwayTimepoint: At the end of intubation

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sunil B V

Kasturba Medical College and Hospitals, Mangalore

drsunilbv@gmail.com9620178559

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026