FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of dental Implant positioning outcomes between computer-supported implant placement surgical procedures

Comparative Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Position in Coronal, Apical and Angular Directions using Dyanamic Navigation and Static Surgical Guide-A Clinical Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/09/073448
Enrollment
24
Registered
2024-09-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Immediate Implant of 4 x 13 mm size Placement using Dyanamic Navigation System.: Extraction of teeth will be done atraumatically with piezo tips. Following sequential drilling, an impla

Sponsors

Dr Sirisha Sadupati
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients of age between 20-50 years. 2.Single-rooted maxillary teeth. 3.ASA I II 4.Intact buccal and palatal cortical plate. 5.Tooth indicated for extraction.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Limited mouth opening 2. Teeth with Active periapical infections. 3. Poor oral compliance and Chronic smokers. 4.ASA III,IV, V 5. Patients subjected to radiotherapy to the head and neck.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of immediate implant placement position in Coronal, Apical and Angular DirectionsTimepoint: Baseline—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NATimepoint: NA—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr D Bheemalingeswara Rao

Vishnu Dental College

bheemalingeswararao.d@vdc.edu.in9701008765

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026