A comparative evaluation of new implant placement technique by conventional way and computerized method: A randomized clinical trial

A comparative evaluation of immediate implant placement by Vestibular socket therapy between Dynamic navigation system and conventional placement in defective labial wall cases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. - nil

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 1Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/09/073313

Enrollment

Registered

2024-09-04

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Dynamic navigation system: Immediate placement of dental implant following vestibular socket protocol using Dynamic navigation system for 6 months Control Intervention1: Conventional fr

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The tooth in the Maxillary anterior region which had undergone trauma, has root fracture or non-vital teeth with thin labial plate /dehiscence which is indicated for extraction and immediate implant placement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Periapical lesions, smokers, pregnant and lactating women, and patients with systemic conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Buccal wall Thickness and marginal bone loss.Timepoint: 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Pink and white esthetic scoreTimepoint: 6 months post-operatively.	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kaarthikeyan G

Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical sciences

kaarthikeyan@saveetha.com9841222027

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026