Comparison of analgesic efficacy between Erector spinae block and Rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus block .

Comparison of analgesic efficacy between ultrasound guided Rhomboid Intercostal Sub-Serratus Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative pain in Modified Radical Mastectomy - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/09/073234

Enrollment

Registered

2024-09-02

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Erector spinae plane block: : Patients will be placed in lateral decubitus position with the operation site up, the vertebrae will be counted from cephalad to caudal direction until re

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patient with diagnosis of breast cancer and ASA grade 1 and 2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.known coagulopathy. 2.allergic to the study drug. 3.hepatic or renal dysfunction. 4.history of receiving anticoagulant treatment. 5.history of chronic opioid consumption. 6.Redo surgeries.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare post-operative NRS score between Rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus block versus Erector spinae plane block.Timepoint: 0 min,30 mins,60 mins,2 hrs,6 hrs,12 hrs and 24 hrs	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare intraoperative hemodynamic stability between Rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus block versus Erector spinae plane block.Timepoint: Systolic blood pressure,Diastolic blood pressure,Heart rarte,Mean arterial pressure at baseline,after induction,after block,5min,10min,15min,30min 60min,90min,120min and fetanyl consumption intraoperatively.;To compare the Needle visibility Score between the two groupsTimepoint: Score 1 – Complete path of needle visualised. Score 2 – Some part of needle visualised. Score 3 – Some part of needle visualised with tissue movement. Score 4 – Some part of needle visualised with hydro dissection and tissue movement. Score 5 – Nothing is visualised, reinsertion required.;To compare total rescue analgesia dose needed between the two groups in post operative period. Timepoint: rescue analgesia-Tramadol 1.5 mg/kg;maximum dose of 3mg/kg over 24 hrs. Adequate analgesia-NRS less than 4	—

Measure

Time frame

To compare intraoperative hemodynamic stability between Rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus block versus Erector spinae plane block.Timepoint: Systolic blood pressure,Diastolic blood pressure,Heart rarte,Mean arterial pressure at baseline,after induction,after block,5min,10min,15min,30min 60min,90min,120min and fetanyl consumption intraoperatively.;To compare the Needle visibility Score between the two groupsTimepoint: Score 1 – Complete path of needle visualised. Score 2 – Some part of needle visualised. Score 3 – Some part of needle visualised with tissue movement. Score 4 – Some part of needle visualised with hydro dissection and tissue movement. Score 5 – Nothing is visualised, reinsertion required.;To compare total rescue analgesia dose needed between the two groups in post operative period. Timepoint: rescue analgesia-Tramadol 1.5 mg/kg;maximum dose of 3mg/kg over 24 hrs. Adequate analgesia-NRS less than 4

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Yashpal Singh

Institute Of Medical Sciences

dryashtrauma@bhu.ac.in9918424416

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026