FindTrial
Sign In

post operative pain management of two different approach , intertruncal and corner pocket approach for supraclavicular block of ulnar nerve

Effect Of Intertruncal And Corner-Pocket Approach Of Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block In Terms Of Ulnar Nerve Blockade: A Randomised Control Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/08/073150
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-08-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: SUPRACLAVICULAR BLOCK: Group A will receive 10 ml of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline and 15ml 0.375% of ropiva- caine through intertruncal approach Intervention2: SUPRACLAVICULAR BLOCK:

Sponsors

Dr Stephen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: american society of anesthesiologist grade 1 and 2 patients of either sex from 18-65 years of age undergoing upper limb surgeries will be included in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of allergy to local anesthetics ,Coagulation disorder ,Mental health issues

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the complete sensory blockade of the ulnar nerve in intertruncal and corner-pocket approachTimepoint: 15mins—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the complete sensory blockade and motor blockade of radial ,median and musculocutaneous nerves in intertruncal and corner-pocket approachTimepoint: 5mins,10mins,15mins,30mins,45mins,60mins,75mins,90mins,105mins,120mins—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactStephen

Department of anesthesia,sri venkateswaraa medical college hospital and research centre,puducherry

rkpuduvai@gmail.com8825778958

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026