None listed
Conditions
Interventions
Control Intervention1: Conventional implant impression: a conventional impression will be taken by Addition silicone impression material
Control Intervention2: Digital implant impression: Digital impl
Sponsors
ITS Dental College Hospital And Research Centre
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1.Two simultaneously placed implants 2.Healthy periodontium 3.Adequate mouth opening.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with smoking or tobacco chewing habits 2.Patients with limited mouth opening 3.Patients not willing to participate in study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To comparatively evaluate 3 Dimensional implant impression accuracy between conventional and digital impression techniquesTimepoint: within 1 month of impression taking | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1.To evaluate 3 Dimensional implant impression accuracy with conventional impression technique. 2.To evaluate 3 Dimensional implant impression accuracy with digital technique using two different intraoral scanners. Timepoint: within 1 month of impression taking | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDr Anju Aggarwal
ITS Dental College Hospital And Research Centre, Greater Noida
Outcome results
None listed