Skip to content

A Comparison of 3D Implant Impression Accuracy Between Traditional and Digital Methods Using Two Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vivo Study

Comparative Evaluation Of the 3 Dimensional Implant Impression Accuracy Between Conventional and Digital Impression Using Two Different Intraoral Scanners:- An In Vivo Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/08/072752
Enrollment
10
Registered
2024-08-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Conventional implant impression: a conventional impression will be taken by Addition silicone impression material Control Intervention2: Digital implant impression: Digital impl

Sponsors

ITS Dental College Hospital And Research Centre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Two simultaneously placed implants 2.Healthy periodontium 3.Adequate mouth opening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with smoking or tobacco chewing habits 2.Patients with limited mouth opening 3.Patients not willing to participate in study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To comparatively evaluate 3 Dimensional implant impression accuracy between conventional and digital impression techniquesTimepoint: within 1 month of impression taking

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To evaluate 3 Dimensional implant impression accuracy with conventional impression technique. 2.To evaluate 3 Dimensional implant impression accuracy with digital technique using two different intraoral scanners. Timepoint: within 1 month of impression taking

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Anju Aggarwal

ITS Dental College Hospital And Research Centre, Greater Noida

anjuagarwal@its.edu.in8800201519

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026