Effectiveness of PNF Vs CIMT on Balance and Gait in Stroke Patients

To Compare the Effectiveness of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) Versus Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) on Balance and gait in Stroke Patients - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/08/072650

Enrollment

Registered

2024-08-19

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I639- Cerebral infarction, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation: 1. Rhythmic initiation 2. Combination of Isotonics (Reversal of Agonists) 3. Reversal of Antagonists a. Dynamic reversal of antagonists b. S

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with MCA non-traumatic ischemic infarction during Recovery Stage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with severe disabling arthritis 2. Patients with any cognitive dysfunction. 3. Any other cardiopulmonary deficits. 4. Any other neurological deficits involving sensory function. 5. Any other musculoskeletal disorder of lower extremity. 6. Patients currently undergoing any gait training exercises. 7. Patient who did not consent for follow up

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Berg Balance Scale (BBS) 2. 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)Timepoint: 4 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Berg Balance Scale (BBS) 2. 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)Timepoint: 2 weeks	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rakesh Khandelwal

Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology

drkneurophysio@gmail.com9928428453

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026