FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare Lumbar paramedian versus Taylor approach in spinal anesthesia in Indian elderly population

Comparative Study of Lumbar Paramedian versus Taylor Approach at Spinal Anesthesia among Indian Elderly Population - NIL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/08/072493
Enrollment
84
Registered
2024-08-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Dr Mandira Mavinakere Giridhar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status II and III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient refusal Infection at the site of injection Allergy Uncorrected Hypovolemia Increased Intracranial Pressure Coagulopathy Sepsis Patients in altered mental status Fixed cardiac output states Indeterminate neurological disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assess blood in CSF Assess aspiration of CSF while injecting drugTimepoint: 2 years—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of needle passes Level of spinal anesthesia achieved immediate adverse effects postoperativelyTimepoint: 2 years—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Arun Kumar HD

Kasturba Medical College and Hospital

arunhd2000@yahoo.com9008415858

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026