To Compare Outcomes after Deep Seated Third Molar Removal Using A Piezotome and A Conventional Rotary Handpiece

Surgical Outcome After Impacted Third Molar Removal Using Piezotome and Conventional Rotary Handpiece :A Comparative Study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/08/072447

Enrollment

Registered

2024-08-13

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Third Molar Surgery using Piezotome: Guttering of bone around third molar will be done using piezotome for better accessibility Control Intervention1: Third molar surgery using a conv

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients requiring surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar 2.Teeth with same Pederson difficulty index 3.Patients who gave written informed consents

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Immunocompromised individuals including those with severe or debilitating diseases 2.Pregnant,lactating,or female participants taking oral contraceptives.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Parameters to be observed: Postoperative pain Oedema Mouth openingTimepoint: 1,3,5,7 day	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Parameters to be observed: Postoperative pain Oedema MouthTimepoint: Postoperative day 2,4,6,8	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR.B.M.Rudagi

DR.DY Patil Dental College and Hospita,DR. DY Patil Vidyapeeth Pimpri Pune

drbmr17@gmail.com9673494111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026