Comparative Evaluation Of Two Obturating System Using CBCT And IOPA

Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Obturating Systems Using CBCT and IOPA – An In Vivo study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/08/072414

Enrollment

Registered

2024-08-12

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K045- Chronic apical periodontitis Health Condition 2: Z020- Encounter for examination for admission to educational institution

Interventions

Intervention1: Thermafil: Obturation using thermafil followed by post obturation radiographic evaluation using cbct. Intervention2: Thermafil: Obturation using thermafil followed by post obturation ra

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with acute and chronic irreversible pulpitis in single rooted premolars. Patient with acute and chronic apical periodontitis in single rooted premolars. Patient with pulpal necrosis in single rooted premolars. Patient in the age group of 20 and 60 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with systemic disease. Pregnant and lactating women. Teeth with incomplete root formation. Teeth with severe periodontal problem. Teeth requiring retreatment. Inability to provide informed consent. Patients having more than one tooth requiring root canal treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
after evalution using cbct and iopa it was concluded that thermafil showed lesser voids compared to obtura 2Timepoint: at baseline	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
visual analogue scale evaluted pain on obturation with obtura 2Timepoint: at baseline	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr DEVIKA B MISHRA

NIMS University

rachit2m@gmail.com9828628808

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026