Skip to content

To study clinical and radiographic difference between two techniques of maxillary sinus lifting and simultaneous implant placement

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes using Crestal Approach Sinus Kit and Osseodensification by Densah Burs for Sinus Membrane Elevation – A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/08/072281
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-08-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Crestal Approach Sinus Kit for Sinus Membrane Elevation: Patients receiving Implants using Crestal Approach Sinus Kit for Indirect Sinus lift procedure Control Intervention1: Osseoden

Sponsors

Dr Ayushi Arvind Nagdeve
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Systemically healthy patients requiring and opting Dental Implants for replacement of missing teeth in maxillary posterior region 2. Patient with Sub-antral Height between 5-8mm (SA-2 / SA-3) 3. Adequate Bucco-palatal width in the edentulous area 4. Patients Having D3 or D4 bone density 5. Patient with age between 25-55 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with systemic diseases that contraindicates the surgery, immune compromised patients 2. Past or present treatment with intravenous amino bisphosphonates. 3. Infection , inflammation , Smokers, undergoing radiation therapy, sinusitis 4. Pathological growth in the sinus 5. Pregnant or lactating females 6. Poor oral hygiene maintenance 7. Severe bruxism 8. Clenching habit 9. Patients not willing to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of Stability of Implants , crestal bone loss, apical bone gain after Implant PlacementTimepoint: Evaluation of Stability of Implants at baseline, 6 months ,9months,crestal bone loss and apical bone gain after 6 months and 9 months after Implant Placement

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
comparison of Implant Stability ,Crestal Bone Loss & Apical Bone Gain after Implants placementTimepoint: comparison of Implant Stability at baseline, 6 months & 9 months ,Crestal Bone Loss & Apical Bone Gain after 6 months & 9 months after Implants placement

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vivek Thombre

Government Dental College and Hospital Nagpur

drvivekthombre@gmail.com9860478817

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026