Comparison of two different indirect sinus lift techniques to achieve sinus lift

Comparative evaluation of extent of sinus lift achieved by crestal approach and Osseodensification: A Randomized controlled trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/08/072247

Enrollment

Registered

2024-08-09

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Indirect sinus lift: sinus lifting procedure Intervention2: Indirect sinus lift technique: comparing two different techniques of indirect sinus lift for elevating the sinus floor and pl

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Single or multiple edentulous sites in posterior maxillary region indicated for implant placement. 2. Residual bone height (between alveolar crest and sinus floor) is in the range of 4 -8 mm 3. Systemically healthy individuals 4. Pneumatized maxillary sinus

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant patients 2. Active sinus infection and inflammation 3. Recent or unhealed extraction sites 4. Patients with medically compromised health 5. Smokers or patient having any adverse habits. 6. Immediate implant placement

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Primary outcome will be extent of sinus lift achievedTimepoint: Preoperative and baseline	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Operators satisfaction & time required for surgery in minutes from baseline to 60 minsTimepoint: Baseline	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr POOJA PAWAR

SMBT IDSR, Dhamangaon, Nashik

drabhikurdukar@gmail.com9881808776

Outcome results