Skip to content

Comparison between the working performance of two supraglottic airway devices I-gel and Air-Q among patients posted for surgery under general anesthesia.

To evaluate the working performance of two supraglottic airway devices - I-gel and Air-Q among patients posted for elective surgeries undergoing general anesthesia in general surgery and gynecology operation theater - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/08/072204
Enrollment
88
Registered
2024-08-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Air Q: supraglottic airway device - Air Q will be used among the patients posted for elective surgeries (Maximum duration 2 hours)under General Anesthesia for securing the airway and he

Sponsors

Government medical College Bhavnagar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patients age 18 to 60 years 2) ASA (American society of anesthesiologist’s) grade I , II, III 3) Scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia 4) BMI less than 30kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients with difficult airway and Mallampati Grade III and IV 2) Patients with history of supraglottic growth 3) Duration of surgery longer than 2 hours 4) Patients with known case of respiratory illness (like COPD , asthma, bronchitis etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess following parameters in both the groups 1) working performance in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure, EtCO2 and Mean tidal expiration volume 2) insertion characteristics in terms of insertion time , number of attempts, manipulations required during insertion and failed insertion ,if any. Timepoint: Before Insertion, After insertion , After 1 minutes,5minutes ,10 minutes and after removal

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the following parameters in both the groups 1) Ease of insertion of orogastric tube through SGA devices. 2) Perioperative hemodynamic response of the patient in terms of pulse rate and mean atrial pressure. 3) Side effects and Complications if any (blood stained device, sore throat and laryngo-bronchospasm) Timepoint: 15 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Chandrika Bhut

Government Medical College Bhavnagar

dr.chandrika62@gmail.com9427040221

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026