Skip to content

Comparison between conventional orthodontic archwires and newly developed archwire called gummetal

Comparative evaluation of microbial adherence and surface roughness between gummetal and stainless steel archwires during canine retraction: a randomized control trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/08/072203
Enrollment
28
Registered
2024-08-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Gummetal archwire: Microbiological and surface analysis after canine retraction on 0.017X0.025-inch Gummetal orthodontic upper archwires. Control Intervention1: Stainless steel: Microbi

Sponsors

Dr Shalini Priya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - The subject with Angle’s Class 1 bimaxillary protrusion or Angle’s Class II div 1 malocclusion with minimal crowding of less than 3 mm requiring extraction of upper first premolars. - Subjects with a full complement of teeth present, excluding third molars - The subjects having a Mombelli bleeding index with a score of =1 and Turesky plaque index with a score of =1.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects having a history of trauma - Subjects with any craniofacial syndromes or clefts. - Periodontally compromised subjects - Prior history of orthodontic treatment - Subjects who had used antibiotics three months prior to the study - Subjects having known allergy to Ni or any other metal - Subjects having abnormalities of root visible on the patient’s OPG.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the surface roughness of SS and GM wires during canine retraction. To evaluate and compare the microbial colonization of Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus in SS and GM wires. Timepoint: baseline and at the end of 26 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the magnitude of canine movement with SS and GM wires. To evaluate and compare the magnitude of anchor loss during canine retraction with SS and GM wires. Timepoint: baseline and at the end of 26 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shalini Priya

Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre

drsgmds3001@gmail.com7827235703

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026