FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between ayurved Regimen and conventional Regimen in management of post normal delivery patients

A study to compare the efficacy of ayurvedic intervention with the conventional intervention in management of episiotomy wound- a non-inferiority open labelled randomized clinical trial - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/08/072122
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-08-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O94- Sequelae of complication of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

All India Institute of Ayurveda
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ICD 11 code for episiotomy is JB44.1- Disruption of perineal obstetric wound The following synonyms will be excluded – 1 Obstetrical breakdown of perineum 2 Disruption of perineal laceration repair in puerperium 3 Wound dehiscence

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Post operative LSCS patients 2. Patients having asthma, COPD, dust allergies 3. Patient having 3rd and 4th degree tear, paraurethral tear

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Healing of episiotomy woundTimepoint: 14th day post Normal vaginal delivery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Reduction in the colony count of bacterias 2.Decrease in pH of lochia Timepoint: 5 days post Normal vaginal delivery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSanika Sanjay Aphale

All India Institute of Ayurveda

swativgaikwad369@gmail.com9270825656

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026