Comparison of two different videolaryngoscopes for inserting endotracheal tube in adult airway:a forward look as by chance medical learning process

Comparison of Mcgrath Videolaryngoscope with BPL Videolaryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation In Adult Patient with normal airway A Prospective Randomised Clinical Study - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/08/072063

Enrollment

100

Registered

2024-08-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K639- Disease of intestine, unspecified Health Condition 2: H65-H75- Diseases of middle ear and mastoid Health Condition 3: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhere Health Condition 4: C169- Malignant neoplasm of stomach, unspecified Health Condition 5: M799- Soft tissue disorder, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: BPL Videolaryngoscope: In any general anaesthesia,endotracheal intubation required is done by mcgrath videolaryngoscope.Intubation time,heamodynamic monitoring and complication is seen

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients posted for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. ASA I &II &III Mouth Opening greater than equal to3FB

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient not willing for participation. Preexisting laryngeal or tracheal pathology Pregnancy Oesophgeal Reflex Disease

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Total duration of intubationTimepoint: T1-Time of video laryngoscopy-Time taken from introduction of Videolaryngoscope Blade to visualization of the glottis. T2-Time of tube Insertion-Time taken from view of glottis to insertion of endotracheal tube and confirmation by capnography.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.POGO Scroing (Percentage of Glottic Opening) o Complete Glottic Aperture visualization-100% o Lower 3rd of glottis + arytenoids visualization-33% o No structure visualization-0% 2. Number of attempts of intubation.(Maximum 2 attempts allowed) 3 Optimization maneuvers required for intubation. 4 To monitor Hemodynamics Parameters. 5 Airway Trauma and Complications. Timepoint: Hemodynamic parameter like heart rate,mean arterial pressure, ETCo2	—

Measure

Time frame

1.POGO Scroing (Percentage of Glottic Opening) o Complete Glottic Aperture visualization-100% o Lower 3rd of glottis + arytenoids visualization-33% o No structure visualization-0% 2. Number of attempts of intubation.(Maximum 2 attempts allowed) 3 Optimization maneuvers required for intubation. 4 To monitor Hemodynamics Parameters. 5 Airway Trauma and Complications. Timepoint: Hemodynamic parameter like heart rate,mean arterial pressure, ETCo2

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrKavita Lalchandani

Government Medical College,Baroda

lalchandanikavita@yahoo.in9274586809

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026