Conventional gingivectomy vs LASER gingivectomy

Comparison of conventional vs LASER gingivectomy in the management of gingival enlargement: A clinical study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/08/071969

Enrollment

Registered

2024-08-06

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K061- Gingival enlargement

Interventions

Intervention1: laser: 980nm wavelength diode laser Control Intervention1: SCALPERL AND LASER: 980nm wavelength diode laser in laser gingivectomy group and 15 size blade in scalpel gingivectomy group

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: age 20 to 45 years old both male and female

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: subjects with systemic diseases,drug induced gingival enlargement, age more than 45 years

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pain and discomfort score in the baseline as 1st day itselfTimepoint: Pain and discomfort score in the baseline as 1st day itself	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
healing in 7th post operative dayTimepoint: healing score in 7th day	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactLogalakxmi JK

Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences

hemaarun21@gmail.com9884970030

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026