Skip to content

A study to measure and compare the implant fixation to bone and mass of the bone of implants placed with two different techniques reverse rotation and osseodensification drilling technique in implants placed in upper arch

Comparative evaluation of Implant Stability and Bone Density in implants placed in the maxillary arch using osseodensification and reverse surgical drilling techniques A randomized controlled study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/08/071893
Enrollment
12
Registered
2024-08-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: reverse drilling technique: this is the modification in conventional drilling technique for the osteotomy for implant placement. in this technique normal conventional drills will be use

Sponsors

Dr Vishva Vachhani
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a Subjects more then or equal to 18 years b Patient who needs minimum of 2 implants in the maxillary arch c If completely edentulous patients needs fixed implant prosthesis d Both the implants site nearly of the same density e Able to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a Patients with medical history in which any dental intervention would be contraindicated b Patients with known allergy to dental implant material (Titanium) c Patients in which sinus lift procedures should be carried out for the implant placement d Patients in which bone graft is needed at the implant placement site e Patient who is current smoker or quieted smoking less then 1 year f Patients undergoing radiotherapy cancer therapy or drug that interfere with the study g completely edentulous patients needed implant supported removable prosthesis h Presence of systemic diseases producing oral manifestations i Patients suffering from any bone related systemic diseases j Patients with any local or systemic disease, condition or medication that might compromise health of the periodontium k Pregnant and lactating women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
implant stability bone densityTimepoint: implant stability at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months after implant placement bone density at baseline and after 6 months of implant placement

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vishva Vachhani

K M Shah Dental College and Hospital

pgp2329@gmail.com9725440155

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026