Skip to content

Evaluating the immediate effect of oromotor stimulation tecniques given intraorally,extraorally or combined in preterm babies

Immediate Effect Of Intraoral Versus Extraoral Versus Combined Oromotor Stimulation In Preterm Neonates A Randomized Control Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/07/071626
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-07-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: ORO MOTOR STIMULATION: INTRAORAL STIMULATION EXTRAORAL STIMULATION COMBINED STIMULATION Intervention2: oromotor intervention: INTRAORAL OMS 6 mins Upper gum for 1 min with minimum 5 re

Sponsors

SHRUTI NAGESH PRABHU
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Neonates of 28 - 37 weeks of gestation. 2. Clinically stable neonates. 3. Neonates of either gender

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Neonates with congenital anomalies affecting feeding like cleft lip, cleft palate. 2. Neonates on mechanical ventilation. 3. Neonates with facial nerve palsy 4. Congenital cardiac conditions ASD VSD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale [POFRAS]Timepoint: the scale will be administered at first reference and later immediately after the intended intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactJYOTI S. JEEVANNAVAR

SDM College of Physiotherapy

jyoti.jeevannavar@sdmuniversity.edu.in9972189767

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026