FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between mCIMT and Bimanual Therapy on the functions of the upper limb in children with cerebral palsy

A comparative analysis of effectiveness of mcimt over bimanual therapy on the upper limb functions in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/07/071625
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-07-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G819- Hemiplegia, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy: It has emerged as a main treatment approach for children with CP. As the clinical use of mCIMT in children continues to grow, additional st

Sponsors

Shamama Athar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosed as CP child with hemiplegia 2. Able to follow verbal instructions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Children with uncontrolled and recent epileptic seizures 2. Children with diplegia, quadriplegia 3. Children with Athetoid CP 4. Children with muscle contracture 5. Upper limb bone deformity Children with diagnosed ASD and ADHD 6. Have undergone any surgical procedure of upper limb 7. Unhealed fracture of upper limb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
MACS(MANUAL ABILITY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM)Timepoint: The MACS scale will be measured on the 1st day of treatment and after completion of 10 weeks of treatment.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
QUEST(Quality of Upper Extremity Skill test)Timepoint: 1st day of treatment and after 10 weeks of treatment—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRajnee Mishra

Burdwan Institute of Medical and Life Sciences

tanimabhattacharyya2013@gmail.com7980327762

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026