Enhancing Flexibility and Quality of Life in Kabaddi Players: A Comparative Study of Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization vs. Neurodynamic Mobilization for Hamstring Tightness

Dynamic soft tissue mobilization versus neurodynamic mobilization on flexibility and quality of life in Kabaddi players With hamstring tightness: a comparative interventional study. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/07/071483

Enrollment

Registered

2024-07-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M00-M99- Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue Health Condition 2: M60-M63- Disorders of muscles

Interventions

Intervention1: Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique: Five deep distal to proximal longitudinal strokes are being applied over the area of tightness on the posterior aspect of the thigh of the p

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: AKEA (Active Knee Extension Angle) below 170 degree Major presenting complaint of tightness in posterior thigh

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any recent hamstring injury. Any recent lower limb fracture. Players with positive slump test. Players having complaint of pain or injury in back. Players having knee or hip joint or stiffness in knee joint. Any recent ligament injury.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
AKEA (Active Knee Extension Angle)Timepoint: 4 WEEKS	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Quality of life SF 36 QuestionnaireTimepoint: 4 weeks	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSumera Khan

Galgotias University

sumera.khan@galgotiasuniversity.edu.in7827777195

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026