Skip to content

To Find The Easier Method To Ventilate The Patient With A Face Mask Using These Conventional, Thenar Eminence, And Hook Methods.

Comparision Of Effectiveness Of Single Handed Mask Ventilation By Conventional, Thenar Eminence And Hook Methods- A Randomised Clinical Study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/07/071475
Enrollment
177
Registered
2024-07-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Hook Technique: Hook Technique: The The patients chin is guided upward by the resuscitators fingers as their hand is put in front of the mask pad, for 90 seconds from the time of succin

Sponsors

Shri B M Patil Medical college Hospital and Research Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: General Anesthesia cases, ASA grade 1 and 2, Mallampati grade 1 and 2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Facial anomalies Nasogastric tube Significant burns Pregnancy Extensive beards and mustaches

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the effectiveness of mask ventilation by conventional method with hook and thenar eminence by ETco2. Timepoint: Intraoperatively After Intravenous Induction With Injection Propofol 2mg/Kg Etco2 is recoded for 1min(10 breaths given )

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To Assess Quality Of Chest RiseTimepoint: Intraoperatively After Intravenous Induction With Injection Propofol 2mg/Kg Chest Rise is assessed for 1 min(10 breaths)

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nirmala Devi

Shri B M Patil Medical college, Hospital and Research Center

nirmalakagalkar77@gmail.com8217618954

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026