Comparison for keeping DJ tent and ureteral catheter post PCNL surgery

Comparison of double-J stenting versus ureteral catheters in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/07/071294

Enrollment

200

Registered

2024-07-25

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Ureteral catheter post PCNL surgery: After the completion of PCNL (per Cutaneous Nephrolithotomy) surgery for renal calculus, patient is left with U-Cath (ureteral catheter) in situ, ou

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of ages above 12 years undergoing PCNL in department of Urology in IPGMER, KOLKATA. Cumulative stone diameter = 4 cm No ureteral obstruction Up to two access sites Those consented to be part of study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient who did not gave consent for the study Patients below age of 12 years Cumulative stone diameter more than 4 cm Presence of ureteral obstruction More than 2 access sites

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To determine if ureteral Catheters have significantly reduced stent related complications when compared with double J stentingTimepoint: Day 1 Day 2 2 Weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To determine if ureteral catheters have comparable rates of complications for urinary extravasation and need for blood transfusion with double J stentsTimepoint: Day 1 Day 2 2 Weeks	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSuhan Khamar

IPGMER and SSKMH

dr.ranjanrajiv@gmail.com9429876581

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026