None listed
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: Tunneled coronally advanced flap in combination with amnion membrane: Tunneled coronally advanced flap versus modified coronally advanced flap in combination with amnion membrane for th
Sponsors
Pragya Atray
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with esthetic concern or hypersensitivity associated with GR, 2. Age = 18 years, Systemically healthy and willing to sign consent form and agreeing to participate in the study 3. Presence of RT1 or RT2 multiple adjacent GRs, 4. At least 1.5 mm of keratinized tissue width (KTW) around the included teeth.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Subjects with an uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g., diabetes, etc.), 2. Smokers, 3. Presence of active periodontal disease, 4. Individuals taking medications, which could interfere with the healing of the soft tissues, 5. Known allergy to any of the biomaterials to be used. 6. Pregnant and lactating
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| recession depth recession width probing depth gingival thickness clinical attachment level Keratinized tissue width Mean Root Coverage Complete Root Coverage Root coverage esthetic scoreTimepoint: Baseline 3 months 6 months | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| PROM Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresTimepoint: 3 and 6 months | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactSangeeta U Nayak
Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka
Outcome results
None listed