FindTrial
Sign In

Randomized study to compare two techniques( TEP and eTEP ) of groin hernia repair in terms of complications after surgery and surgeon learning duration

Comparison of TEP vs eTEP technique for groin hernia repair in terms of post operative outcomes and learning curve : A Randomized trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/07/070887
Enrollment
94
Registered
2024-07-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M959- Acquired deformity of musculoskeletal system, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: extended Total extraperitoneal repair: The patient will be placed in a supine position with both hands by the side. The retro rectus space will be created after making a transverse inci

Sponsors

Dr. Asuri Krishna
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients in the age group of 18-65 years with groin hernia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Complicated hernia (strangulated) Patients unfit for general anesthesia Patients who refused to give consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Post operative pain, Wound infection, Seroma, Early Recurrence Timepoint: At 6 hours, 24 hours, 1 week and 3months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
the ease of operability, patient’s quality of life(WHOQOL-BREF), learning curveTimepoint: patient’s quality of life(WHOQOL-BREF) at the time of admission and at 3 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactD Lipton Mitra

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

dr.asurikrishna@gmail.com9999405767

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026