FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of the primary and delayed stability of dental implants using lateral window approach & crestal approach by hydraulic lift.

Comparative evaluation of stability of dental implants placed in inadequate height maxillary posterior region using two different sinus lift techniques- An in vivo study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/07/070681
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-07-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K063- Horizontal alveolar bone loss

Interventions

Intervention1: Implant placement by lateral window approach: 10 dental implants would be placed by this technique using bone graft. Primary and Delayed stability will be evaluated. Control Interventio

Sponsors

ITS Dental College Hospital And Research Centre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Partially edentulous maxilla patients with residual alveolar crest of =5mm in height. Age-more than 20 years. Presence of at least one intact adjacent tooth. Good oral hygiene and satisfactory periodontal status of remaining dentition.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 one year before implantation. Any systemic disease contraindicating implant placement. Uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis, hypertension etc. Bleeding disorders. Psychosis or Psychiatric disorders. Pregnant or lactating women. Acute or Chronic recurrent sinusitis. Lack of opposite occluding dentition or prosthesis in the area intended for implant placement. Severe bruxism or clenching. Smokers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1)Evaluation of primary stability in dental implants placed in inadequate height maxillary posterior region using lateral window approach. 2)Evaluation of primary stability in dental implants placed in inadequate height maxillary posterior region using crestal approach by hydraulic lift. 3) Evaluation of delayed stability after 1 year, in dental implants placed in inadequate height maxillary posterior region using lateral window approach. 4)Evaluation of delayed stability after 1 year, in dental implants placed in inadequate height maxillary posterior region using crestal approach by hydraulic lift. Timepoint: At 6 months and 12 months.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) Comparative evaluation of primary stability in dental implants placed in inadequate height maxillary posterior region using lateral window approach and crestal approach. 2) Comparative evaluation of delayed stability after 1 year, in dental implants placed in inadequate height maxillary posterior region by lateral window approach & crestal approach. Timepoint: At 6 months & 12 months.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aditya Chaudhary

ITS Dental College Hospital And Research Centre

adityachaudharyy@its.edu.in9868911499

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026