To compare the implant is stable at the time of placement and after 4-8 weeks in patient and also giving cap on the implants in the early phase and checking the stability of the implants, after they are loaded

A comparative evaluation of primary and secondary stability in immediate and early placed implants with early loading-an invivo study - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/07/070593

Enrollment

Registered

2024-07-15

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified Health Condition 2: K084- Partial loss of teeth Health Condition 3: K084- Partial loss of teeth Health Condition 4: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: To compare primary and secondary stability of immediate placed and early placed implants with early loading.: Teeth will be extracted, and implants will be placed on the same day in the

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Good oral hygiene. 2.Patient in the age group of 18-55 years 3.Group A- Hopeless tooth in the anterior aesthetic zone 4.Group B - Missing tooth (4-8 weeks) soft tissue healing completed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 According to ASA Classification Class 4 and Class 3 patients. 2 Immunocompromised patients. 3 Occlusal anomalies 4 Deep Bite 5 Cross Bite 6 Para-functional habits 7 Bruxism 8 Radiation therapy in orofacial region 9 Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day) 10. Alcohol abusers 11. Recent history of any acute illness 12. Patients having unrealistic expectations and psychological problems.Teeth associated with large periapical lesions (granuloma & cyst)® 13. Periodontally compromised teeth with one or more bony wall defects 14. Presence of dehiscence or fenestrations of residual bony walls 15. Insufficient inter-arch space 16. Intraoral draining sinus in relation to the proposed implant site 17. Perforation and/or loss of labial bony plate during extraction 18. Unfavourable implant axis orientation 19. Patients with TMJ disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
we will get to know which type of placement is better for early loadingTimepoint: at baseline, 1 month, and 4 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
we will get to know which type of placement is better for esthetics and soft tissueTimepoint: 9 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Reshu Sanan

SGT Dental College and Research institute

reshu.sanan@sgtuniversity.org9910063626

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026