Skip to content

Whether LMA Protector is better than I Gel for airway management in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between supraglottic airway devices LMA Protector and I-Gel® in obese patients during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized control trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/07/070136
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-07-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Patna
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Obese patients 2. Age 18 to 60 years 3. ASA Physical status I and II planned for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient refusal 2. Anticipated difficult airway 3. History of gastroesophageal reflux diseases Patients with previous abdominal surgery and/or comorbidities that would affect surgical time time under anaesthesia 4. Expected duration of surgery is more than 3 hours 5. Any surgery with expected postoperative ICU admission

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oropharyngeal leak pressureTimepoint: 1. Before pneumoperitoneum 2. 15 minutes after pneumoperitoneum

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare The peak pressure before and after pneumoperitoneum Fiberoptic glottic views Insertion attempts Insertion time Number and type of airway manipulation Perioperative and postoperative anaesthesia-related problems Timepoint: Intra operative

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Abhyuday Kumar

AIIMS Patna

drabhyudaykumar@aiimspatna.org9013512403

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026