Comparitive study of ropivacaine vs ropivacaine with dexamethasone in ultrasound guided nerve block in patients undergoing hip surgery for preoperative and postoperative pain

A Randomized Comparative Study Of Ropivacaine Vs Ropivacaine With Dexamethasone In Ultrasound Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block For Preoperative and Postoperative Analgesia In Patients Undergoing Elective Hip Surgery SMS Medical College, Jaipur.. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/07/070130

Enrollment

Registered

2024-07-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M859- Disorder of bone density and structure, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: USG guided PENG block(Ropivacaine with Dexamethasone): Patients will receive ultrasound guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with 20ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine( 13ml of 0.75% Ropivacaine+ 7

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient undergoing elective surgery for hip fracture under spinal anesthesia. Patients consenting to participate. Adult patients. Patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I, II and III.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients participating in other study Uncooperative patients Patients with psychiatric illness Patients with peripheral sensorineural de ?cit. Patients allergic to local anesthetics. Infection at the site of block Patients with contraindications to regional anaesthesia. Patients with suspected compartment syndrome in lower limbs.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1.To asses and compare NRS after giving PENG block between both the groups before positioning for spinal anesthesia. 2.To asses and compare total duration of analgesia between both the groups. Timepoint: 1.To asses and compare Numerical rating scale (NRS) score in postoperative period at 30minute,1,2,4,6,12,18, and 24 hr. between both the groups 2.To determine the difference in mean dose of analgesic required for 24 hours in both groups.	—

Measure

Time frame

1.To asses and compare NRS after giving PENG block between both the groups before positioning for spinal anesthesia. 2.To asses and compare total duration of analgesia between both the groups. Timepoint: 1.To asses and compare Numerical rating scale (NRS) score in postoperative period at 30minute,1,2,4,6,12,18, and 24 hr. between both the groups 2.To determine the difference in mean dose of analgesic required for 24 hours in both groups.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.To determine the change in the hemodynamic parameters (HR, SBP, DBP, MAP and SpO2) in both groups. 2.To assess and compare patient satisfaction using Three-Point Likert Rating Scale between both groups. Timepoint: 1.To determine the change in the hemodynamic parameters (HR, SBP, DBP, MAP and SpO2) in both groups at hourly intervals till 6hrs and 2 hrly intervals till 24 hrs. 2.To assess and compare patient satisfaction after 24 hrs.	—

Measure

Time frame

1.To determine the change in the hemodynamic parameters (HR, SBP, DBP, MAP and SpO2) in both groups. 2.To assess and compare patient satisfaction using Three-Point Likert Rating Scale between both groups. Timepoint: 1.To determine the change in the hemodynamic parameters (HR, SBP, DBP, MAP and SpO2) in both groups at hourly intervals till 6hrs and 2 hrly intervals till 24 hrs. 2.To assess and compare patient satisfaction after 24 hrs.

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Chethan O S

SMS Medical College and Hospital

drmamtakhandelwal@gmail.com9929338174

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026