Skip to content

A comparision of heamodynamic changes of two airway devices i gel® and endotracheal tube used by trainees during surgery.

Haemodynamic Responses to insertion of i gel® and endotracheal tube in adult patients posted for elective surgery under general anaesthesia by novices-a prospective observational study - NIL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/07/069933
Enrollment
74
Registered
2024-07-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Control Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

K S Hegde Medical Academy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients undergoing general anaesthesia with an endotracheal tube or I gel® Patients belong to ASA grade I and II Both male and female patients. Mallampati grading classes I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Predicted difficult intubation Emergency surgery Surgery with full stomach Obese patients (BMI >30kg/m2) Cardiovascular diseases patients Increased intracranial pressure patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary objective is to observe different haemodynamic parameters in these techniques in terms of HR, SBP, DBP & MAPTimepoint: during anaesthesia administartion

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to observe the time taken during the insertion of devices & to achieve normal capnographyTimepoint: intraoperative period

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactT V Megha Manoj

K S HEGDE MEDICAL ACADEMY

anandabangera@gmail.com9845278880

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026