Comparative Effect of Combined Mckenzie Therapy and Muscle Energy Technique Versus Mckenzie Therapy on Mechanical Neck Pain

Comparative Effect of Combined Mckenzie Therapy and Muscle Energy Technique Versus Mckenzie Therapy on Pain, Range of Motion, and Function in Individuals with Postural and Dysfunctional Mechanical Neck Pain- A Quasi-Experimental Study - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/07/069754

Enrollment

Registered

2024-07-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M953- Acquired deformity of neck

Interventions

Intervention1: Mckenzie exercise and Muscle energy technique.: 1. Mckenzie exercise: Neck extension in supine,Retraction,Neck flexion in sitting, Neck extension, Lateral bending and Head turning for 1

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. NSNP more than 7 days. 2. Patients aged between 20 - 55. 3. Both males and females. 4. Postural and dysfunctional syndrome. 5. NPRS pain intensity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Currently diagnosed with cervical disc prolapse. 2. Tumors of cervical spine.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Neck disability indexTimepoint: 1 day, 6 week	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NPRS Bubble inclinometer Craniovertebtal angle Muscle length testing Global rating of change scaleTimepoint: 1 day,6 week	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSILPA KC

Institute of physiotherapy/ Srinivas University

kamalakannan.pt@gmail.com9500931424

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026