Difference in outcomes in people undergoing patella/knee cap modification in total knee replacement

Comparative functional outcomes of resurfacing of Patella in patients undergoing Posterior stabilized versus Cruciate retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: A non-randomized Clinical Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/06/069608

Enrollment

112

Registered

2024-06-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M179- Osteoarthritis of knee, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Arm 1 -Patella resurfacing in Posterior stabilised Total knee arthroplasty: Patient will be undergoing Patella resurfacing in PS TKR and will be Followed up for 6weeks Intervention2: Ar

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients of age between 50-75 years. Either gender. Patient with primary Osteoarthritis knee varus deformity with knee.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Knee with secondary osteoarthritis. Revision total knee arthroplasty. Previous patellar fracture/ Patella replacement. Hip and ankle pathology Previous fracture around knee. Osteomyelitis knee/ Inflammatory arthritis. Patella femoral instability.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparision of functional outcomes of patella resurfacing and non resurfacing in Total knee arthroplastyTimepoint: preop, postop, 6weeks, 6months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Comparision of functional outcomes in patients undergoing PS and CR TKRTimepoint: preop, postop, 6week, 6months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Tarun Goyal

Aiims Bathinda

goyal.tarun@gmail.com8475000283

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026