Skip to content

Comparing Two Methods of Corneal Treatment in Patients Aged 6-35 with Keratoconus

Comparison of efficacy between accelerated epithelium-off and accelerated epithelium-on corneal collagen crosslinking in patients with keratoconus - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/06/069279
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-06-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H186- Keratoconus Health Condition 2: H186- Keratoconus

Interventions

Intervention1: C3R using Ribofast dye: performing epi on C3R using ribofast dye. dye application 1 drop every minute for 30 minutes followed UV irradiation for 10 minutes with ribofast dye 1 drop per

Sponsors

Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Hospitals Guru nanak eye centre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Central corneal thickness more than 400 microns at the thinnest point

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a)Patients with history of trauma and prior ocular surgery b)Corneal scar or history of herpetic keratitis c)Active vernal keratoconjunctivitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1)Change in maximum keratometry (Kmax) at 6 monthsTimepoint: 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1)Demarcation line on anterior segment OCT at 1 month 2)Change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6months 3)Endothelial cell density at 6 months Timepoint: 1 month,6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pushkar Rangari

Department of Ophthalmology Maulana Azad Medical College And associated G.N.E.C

pushkarrangari@gmail.com9820089224

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026