"Comparing Tooth Repair Medicines After Laser and Traditional Pulp Therapy: Which Works Better?"

Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiographic success of Biodentine and Bioceramic as a pulp medicament after Laser and conventional pulpotomy in primary molars- A double blinded randomized controlled trial.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/06/069218

Enrollment

Registered

2024-06-19

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Bioceramic and Laser pulpotomy in primary molars: For laser pulpotomy, the pulp is ablated to the level of the canal orifice using diode laser with 980 nm wavelength, 0.8 W of power and

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Primary molar tooth not more than one-third of root resorption. Children with deep dental caries approximating the pulp in primary molars assessed both clinically and radiographically.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children with special health care needs and systemic illness Primary molars with any congenital deformities.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
All cause morbidity at 3 months. Success rate of pulpotomy at 3 months (defined as absence of clinical symptoms and radiographic signs of pathology).Timepoint: baseline, 3 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
All cause morbidity at 1, 3 months. Incidence of post-operative pain, Incidence of post-operative infection, Radiographic evidence of root resorptionTimepoint: at baseline, 1 month, 3 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr DHIVYA SHANTHI

Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital

selvabalaji88@gmail.com9003604774

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026