Comparing Dental Treatment Quality, Time, and Pain in Childrens Back Teeth Using Different Methods

Clinical Comparison of Obturation Quality, Instrumentation Time and Post-Operative Pain in Primary Posterior Maxillary Teeth using Single Rotary File, Sequential Rotary File, and Manual File System: A Single Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/06/069200

Enrollment

Registered

2024-06-19

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Kedo S Plus: Rotary single file system from KEDO Dental used to perform pulpectomy Intervention2: Pro AF Baby: Rotary sequential file system from Kids-e-dental used to perform pulpectom

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: healthy children requiring pulpectomy for one of their primary second mandibular molars.root length, available coronal structure, resorption, special needs, and systemic diseases. Inclusion criteria included primary mandibular molars, whether vital or non-vital, without a sinus tract, showing no signs of internal or external pathologic root resorption, and possessing adequate coronal tooth structure for stainless steel crown placement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: children lacking cooperative ability, those with underlying systemic diseases, and those with special healthcare needs

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Obturation QualityTimepoint: Immediate post-operative	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Instrumentation timeTimepoint: seconds;Post-operative painTimepoint: 12, 24, and 48 hours	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGanesh Jeevanandan

Saveetha Dental College and Hospital

helloganz@gmail.com9884293869

Outcome results