FindTrial
Sign In

A study compare whetherisolated anesthesia of male external genital organ or caudal block for children undergoing operation on male genitals.

Comparison of analgesic effect of USG guided caudal block and USG guided penile block for children going for circumcision surgery - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/06/069156
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-06-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N472- Paraphimosis Health Condition 2: N471- Phimosis

Interventions

Intervention1: USG guided caudal block: Application of USG guided caudal epidural block with 0.25% bupivacaine according to weight of the patient after induction of anesthetisia. Control Intervention1

Sponsors

DR Pujaben barad
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) patient posted for circumsion surgery 2) age between 2 to 6 years 3) patients giving written valid consent 4) ASA physical status 1,2,3.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients with poor glasgow coma scale 2) patients with skin lession at local site 3) patient with local anesthetic allergy 4) Patient requiring spinal Anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of postoperative analgesic effect using FLACC behavioural scaleTimepoint: Assessment of postoperative analgesic effect using FLACC behavioural scale at post operative 1,2,4,6,8 and 10 hours—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to compare total duration of hospital stay and compliance between 2 groupsTimepoint: upto 24 hours postoperatively—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pujaben barad

GMERS Medical College Junagadh

poojabarad28.pb@gmail.com9601377008

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026