Skip to content

Comparing Two Types of Reinforced Filling Materials for Severely Damaged Back Teeth: A One-Year Study

One year comparative evaluation of performance of short glass fiber reinforced composite resin versus combination of short glass fiber with polyethylene fiber reinforced composite resin on badly broken-down vital posterior tooth: a randomized clinical study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/06/069027
Enrollment
66
Registered
2024-06-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K025- Dental caries on pit and fissure surface

Interventions

Intervention1: combination of short glass fiber everx flow with polyethylene fiber reinforced composite resin: everx flow material is composed of short, randomly oriented glass fibers of length 140µm

Sponsors

Dr Ruchi Kumar Purbey
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients between 18 â?? 60 years of age with moderate to enlarge carious lesions involving one or more cusps in vital molars and premolars with clinical diagnosis of reversible pulpitis will be included in the study.26 2. Teeth with radiographic findings revealing radiolucency in coronal dentin with presence of hard dentin between base of the caries and pulp horn on RVG will be included.27 3. Teeth indicated for re-restoration will be included. 4. Teeth with intact and healthy adjacent and opposing tooth will be included. 5. A written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and only those patients ready to sign the consent form will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with poor oral hygiene, severe periodontal disease, mal-aligned and heavy bruxism resulting in lost physiologic contour will be excluded. 2. Tooth indicated as an abutment for fixed partial denture and tooth having more than grade 1 mobility will be excluded. 3. Teeth with developmental anomaly or pathology or congenital defects will be excluded. 4. Patients with Non restorable subgingival caries/ fracture will be excluded. 5. Patients with occlusal discrepancies will be excluded. 6. Pregnant and lactating mothers will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To clinically evaluate and compare the functional, biological and aesthetic properties of using short glass fiber reinforced composite resin versus combination of short glass fiber with polyethylene fiber reinforced composite resin based on Revised FDI criteria to evaluate direct dental restorations at 6 and 12 months on badly broken-down vital posterior teeth.Timepoint: baseline 6 months and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nimisha Shah

K M Shah Dental College And Hospital

nshah7873@gmail.com9998994299

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026