Skip to content

Safety of modified surgery in removal of kidney stones

Safety and efficacy of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy using suction sheath versus conventional sheath: A randomised controlled trial

Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/06/068895
Enrollment
90
Registered
2024-06-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy using suction sheath: After dilatation of percutaneous tract, mPCNL using suction sheath, 14/16Fr ClearPetra® nephrostomy sheath will be placed at perc

Sponsors

Rabindra Tamang
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients undergoing mPCNL in the Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant Surgery, TUTH

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age less than 18 years male and female patients Patients with congenital anomalies of kidney like horse shoe kidney, duplex system or with diverticular disease History of open intervention in ipsilateral kidney Patients undergoing bilateral mPCNL or simultaneous retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) or ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Stone free ratesTimepoint: 6 weeks after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1 Operative time 2 ComplicationsTimepoint: 4 weeks

Countries

Nepal

Contacts

Public ContactRabindra Tamang

Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine

premgyawali@gmail.com9851033233

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026