Preformed Zirconia Crown Versus Preformed Bioflex Crown In 4-9 Year Old Children: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.

Comparative Evaluation Of Gingival Health, Wear Of Antagonist Tooth And Parental Satisfaction In Preformed Zirconia Crown Versus Preformed Bioflex Crown In 4-9 Year Old Children: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/06/068870

Enrollment

Registered

2024-06-13

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K025- Dental caries on pit and fissure surface

Interventions

Intervention1: bioflex crown: Bioflex crown were placed in pulectomised primary molar in chidren 4-9 yr of age duration of study 6 months Control Intervention1: zirconia crown: Zirconia crown were pl

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Clinical criteria age group 4-9 year old children 2 Patients undergone Pulpectomy in first or second primary molar bilaterally 3 No mobility 4 Sound antagonist tooth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Systemic disease 2 Unrestorable tooth 3 Radiographic examination reveals a internal and external resorption 4 Patients with bruxism habit

Design outcomes

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Is there any difference in Gingival Health, wear of antagonist tooth and Parental Satisfaction in Preformed Zirconia Crown and Preformed Bioflex Crown placed following primary tooth pulp therapy in children 4-9 year oldTimepoint: 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Prasad Jathar

Sinhgad dental college and hospital pune

prasad.jathar@gmail.com9545047035

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026