FindTrial
Sign In

Treatment of missing teeth in patients with thin bone using two type of dental implants.

Comparative evaluation of crestal bone loss between SLA and RBM surface implants in Narrow Alveolar ridges with Osseo densification technique - An Observational clinical trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/06/068805
Enrollment
36
Registered
2024-06-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K082- Atrophy of edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: RBM Implant Group: RBM implants is placed under local anesthesia for the management of narrow alveolar ridge to evaluate the crestal bone loss,primary and secondary stability will be me

Sponsors

Harini K
Lead Sponsor
SRM Dental College
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Narrow ridge 4-6mm (Moderate) - Tolstunov’s classification of alveolar ridge width. 2. Patients who are between 20-55 years of age. 3. All sites had to be healed sites, that is at least 6 months of post extraction healing was required

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Pregnancy and lactating women 2.Smokers and HBA1c exceeding 6.3 3.Known allergry to any material or medication used in the study 4. Any previous history of head and neck radiation therapy 5.Chemotherapy in the last 12 months 6.Severe pyschologic problems 7.Patient not willing to sign the consent approved by the human tudies committee 8. Debilitating systemic diseases or conditions that have a clinically significant effect on without healing 9.History of oral or intravenous bisphosphonate use for more than 3 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of crestal bone loss between SLA and RBM surface implants in narrow alveolar ridgeTimepoint: subjects will be followed at 0 4 8 12 16 weeks after implant placement—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Comparison of primary stability between SLA and RBM surface implants in narrow alveolar ridges. 2.Comparison of secondary stability of SLA surface implants in narrow alveolar ridge using OD technique. 3. Comparison of secondary stability of RBM surface implants in narrow alveolar ridge using OD technique. 4. CBCT comparison of Ridge width changes from baseline with SLA implants using OD technique. 5. CBCT comparison of Ridge width changes from baseline with RBM implants using OD technique. 6. Comparison of buccal bone width changes from baseline with SLA implant in OD technique. 7. Comparison of buccal bone width changes from baseline with RBM implant in OD technique, Timepoint: subjects will be followed at 0 4 8 12 16 weeks after implant placement—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Harinath P

SRM Dental College

harinatp@srmist.edu.in9840482400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026