study on outcome of slab vs cast application in type 3 supracondylar fracture

Short-Term Functional and Radiological outcome Analysis of Cast Vs Slab Splintage in Operated Case of Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fracture- Randomized Control Trial - nil

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/06/068504

Enrollment

Registered

2024-06-06

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S424- Fracture of lower end of humerus

Interventions

Intervention1: cast or slab application in post operative period after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning: patient will be applied either above elbow cast or above elbow slab in post operative

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. closed fractures 2. isolated type III supracondylar humerus fractures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: open fractures

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
to estimate and compare incidence of loss of reduction by using Baumanns angle in patient with type III supracondylar fractures treated with above elbow cast and above elbow slab in post operative period after CRPPTimepoint: 3weeks and 3 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
to find out incidence of complications between the two groups in post operative periodTimepoint: upto 3 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBhuwan Raj Aryal

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

bhu.ary9@gmail.com8847311722

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026