Compare the effect of reduced auditory stimulus and normal auditory stimulus on Ability to move quickly and easily, Proprioception , Balance and Skate Performance among roller skate athletes.

Comparative Effect of Training with Reduced auditory stimulus versus Normal Auditory Stimulus on Balance, Agility, Proprioception, and Skate Performance among competitive roller skate Athletes. - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/05/068213

Enrollment

Registered

2024-05-31

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Fitness and skill training with reduced audio stimulus: 1.Warm up for not more than 15 mins 2.Regular fitness and skill training given by coach with reduced audio stimulus using ear plu

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Athletes Actively Involved in Sports For More Than 2 Years 2.Athletes Must Have Played At Least District Level

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Any Recent Injuries of Upper Limb, Lower Limb And spine 2.With Required Hospitalization Within Last 6 Months 3.History of Any Head Injury 4.Any Major illness which requires hospitalization

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Y Balance Test 2. Agility T Test 3. Roller Skater Performance Test 4. Kinovea Software for proprioceptionTimepoint: 1. Baseline 2. After 4 Weeks of Intervention	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr M Vijayakumar

Dr D Y Patil college of Physiotherapy

m.vijayakumar@dpu.edu.in9595716282

Outcome results